LLM Landscape 2026: Intelligence Leaderboard and Model Guide

An in-depth April 2026 snapshot of the top AI language models, ranked one representative per vendor using a composite capability index that spans reasoning, coding, multimodal, and long-context benchmarks. Updated to reflect the current frontier: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V3.2, and a field of emerging challengers from Xiaomi, Z.ai, MiniMax, and beyond.

Leaderboard Methodology

The table below ranks one model per provider — the provider's newest or most clearly superior flagship. Scores use the AA (Artificial Analysis) composite capability index, which aggregates performance across MMLU-Pro, SWE-bench, GPQA, ARC-AGI, AIME, and long-context evaluations into a single normalized integer rather than citing a single benchmark as the headline number. Context windows are shown as token counts with commas; missing public data is shown as "—". Pricing is per million tokens (input / output); N/A values are also shown as "—".

The Intelligence Leaderboard: Top 20 LLMs by Vendor (April 2026)

RankModelCapability Index
(AA Index)
Context Window
(tokens)
Input Cost
($/M tokens)
Output Cost
($/M tokens)
Notes
1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google
571,000,000$1.25$10.00Current Google flagship; strongest all-round cross-vendor entry
2
GPT-5.4 (xhigh)
OpenAI
571,050,000$2.50$15.00OpenAI flagship for professional work; strongest OpenAI representative
3
Claude Opus 4.6 (max)
Anthropic
531,000,000$5.00$25.00Anthropic flagship; strongest coding and agentic representative
4
GLM-5
Z.ai
50200,000$1.00$3.20New top-tier entrant; strong agentic engineering positioning
5
MiMo-V2-Pro
Xiaomi
491,000,000Very strong new Chinese contender; pricing not publicly disclosed
6
Grok 4.20 Beta 0309
xAI
48200,000+$2.00$6.00xAI flagship; fast, tool-heavy, agentic model
7
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Alibaba
45262,000$0.60$3.60Open Weight Best current Qwen-family representative; Apache 2.0
8
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek AI
42128,000$0.28$0.42Open Weight Best-value frontier entry on pure cost-performance
9
MiniMax-M2.7
MiniMax
42Strong current entrant; notable capability/value tradeoff
10
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
NVIDIA
361,000,000$0.30$0.75Open Weight Strong open enterprise contender; excellent price/performance
11
Kimi K2
Moonshot AI
26128,000$0.57$2.40Open Weight Open-weight and inexpensive; strong value entry
12
Mistral Large 3
Mistral
23Best current public Mistral flagship
13
Nova Premier
Amazon
191,000,000$2.50$12.50Hyperscaler representative; broad enterprise relevance
14
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Baidu
15Best verifiable ERNIE-family public entry
15
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
1410,000,000Open Weight Context-window outlier; 10M tokens for self-hosting
16
Command A
Cohere
13256,000$2.50$10.00Practical enterprise/workflow model; RAG and tool use focus
17
Granite 4.0 H Small
IBM
11Open Weight Enterprise and open-governance relevance
18
Jamba 1.7 Large
AI21
11Solid enterprise positioning; hybrid SSM/Transformer architecture
19
Yi-Lightning
01.AI
Vendor-diversity slot; public specs not fully verified
20
gpt-oss-120B
OpenAI (open-weight)
33$0.30$0.30Open Weight Separate open-weight category; distinct from GPT-5.4 flagship

Key Takeaways

Peak Intelligence (Tied)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-5.4 share the top composite AA Index score (57), each excelling across reasoning, coding, and multimodal evaluations — no single OpenAI or Google model holds an outright lead.
Coding & Agentic Leadership
Claude Opus 4.6 leads SWE-bench Verified and long-running agentic tasks. Grok 4.20 dominates fast, tool-heavy, real-time workflows. Both define the current ceiling for AI-assisted software development.
Context-Window Outlier
Llama 4 Scout pushes open-weight context to 10,000,000 tokens — enabling full-codebase and corpus-scale analysis in a single pass. The top closed flagships cluster at 1,000,000–1,050,000 tokens.
Cost-Efficient Frontier
DeepSeek V3.2 ($0.28 / $0.42 per M) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super ($0.30 / $0.75) deliver near-frontier capability at a near order-of-magnitude cost discount versus top closed flagships — making capable AI accessible at scale.
Emerging Challengers
MiMo-V2-Pro (Xiaomi, AA 49), GLM-5 (Z.ai, AA 50), and MiniMax-M2.7 all break into the top 10, signaling a genuinely global competitive frontier where the leading labs are no longer exclusively Western.

Key Performance Metrics

Task-Specific Leaders
ModelBenchmark Leadership
Gemini 3.1 ProARC-AGI-2 & multimodal · AA 57
GPT-5.4GPQA Diamond & AIME · AA 57
Claude Opus 4.6SWE-bench Verified · coding & agents · AA 53
GLM-5 & MiMo-V2-ProNew top-10 entrants · agentic & reasoning · AA 49–50
Context Window Champions
ModelTokens
Llama 4 Scout10,000,000
GPT-5.41,050,000
Gemini 3.1 · Claude · MiMo · Nemotron1,000,000
Qwen3.5 397B262,000
DeepSeek V3.2 · Kimi K2128,000
10M tokens fits entire codebases; 1M+ handles legal corpora and research archives in one pass
Cost Efficiency
TierModelsOutput $/M
Best ValueDeepSeek V3.2 · Nemotron$0.42–$0.75
Mid-RangeKimi K2 · Qwen3.5 · GLM-5$2.40–$3.60
FlagshipGemini 3.1 · Grok 4.20$6.00–$10.00
PremiumGPT-5.4 · Claude Opus 4.6$15.00–$25.00
Open-weight models (DeepSeek, Nemotron, Kimi K2) reach near-frontier capability at a fraction of closed-model cost

Specialized Performance Highlights

Speed & Latency
Grok 4.20
Purpose-built for fast, tool-heavy, real-time agent loops — lowest-latency frontier model in the top 10
Flash & Haiku-class siblings
Latency-optimized variants (Gemini Flash, Claude Haiku) sit outside the one-per-vendor table — recommended for interactive and streaming applications
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Competitive throughput at open-weight cost — strong for high-volume enterprise inference pipelines
Open-Weight Excellence
ModelKey Strength
Llama 4 Scout10M-token context · corpus-scale tasks
Qwen3.5 397B262K ctx · multilingual · Apache 2.0
DeepSeek V3.2$0.28 / $0.42 per M · near-frontier reasoning
NVIDIA Nemotron1M context · enterprise self-hosting
Kimi K2$0.57 / $2.40 per M · open-weight value
Open-weight models now rival closed flagships on most non-frontier tasks at a fraction of the cost

Model Selection Guide

Peak Intelligence
Gemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.4
Both score AA 57 — best when reasoning depth, scientific accuracy (GPQA), or multimodal evaluation is the primary constraint
Coding & Agents
Claude Opus 4.6Grok 4.20
Claude Opus 4.6 for complex, long-running agentic workflows; Grok 4.20 for fast, tool-heavy, real-time agent loops
Massive Context
Llama 4 ScoutGPT-5.4Gemini 3.1 Pro
Llama 4 Scout (10M tokens, open-weight) for full-codebase tasks; GPT-5.4 (1.05M) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (1M) for closed-model long-document pipelines
Cost Optimization
DeepSeek V3.2NVIDIA NemotronKimi K2
Sub-$1/M output for capable reasoning — DeepSeek ($0.42) and Nemotron ($0.75) lead for high-volume or cost-sensitive workloads
Self-Hosting
Llama 4 ScoutQwen3.5 397BDeepSeek V3.2NVIDIA NemotronKimi K2
All five are open-weight — pick by context need (Llama 4 Scout), language coverage (Qwen3.5), or lowest cost (DeepSeek, Kimi K2)
Agentic Engineering
GLM-5MiMo-V2-Pro
New top-10 entrants from Z.ai and Xiaomi positioning strongly for next-generation tool-use and agentic engineering pipelines

Industry Impact & Future Trends (2026)

The 2026 LLM landscape is defined by task-specific leadership, a more distributed competitive frontier, and a widening gap between flagship and cost-efficient tiers:

Coding & Agents
Claude Opus 4.6 leads on SWE-bench Verified and long-running agentic tasks. Grok 4.20 excels in fast, tool-heavy workflows. GLM-5 from Z.ai is a notable new entry positioning strongly for agentic engineering pipelines.
Context & Long-Horizon
GPT-5.4's 1.05M-token window and Gemini 3.1 Pro's 1M context enable large-scale document and codebase processing in one pass. Llama 4 Scout's open-weight 10M-token context opens research-scale and corpus applications for self-hosters.
Cost & Open Weight
DeepSeek V3.2 ($0.28 / $0.42 per M) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super ($0.30 / $0.75) deliver near-frontier capability at a fraction of closed-flagship cost. Qwen3.5 and Kimi K2 add multilingual and agentic depth to the open-weight tier.

Conclusion

The April 2026 LLM landscape is defined by task-specific leadership across a more distributed set of vendors than ever before. Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and OpenAI's GPT-5.4 share the top composite capability score, each excelling across reasoning, coding, and multimodal evaluations. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6 leads on coding and agentic benchmarks, while xAI's Grok 4.20 dominates fast, tool-heavy agent workflows. New entrants from Xiaomi (MiMo-V2-Pro) and Z.ai (GLM-5) break into the top 10, reflecting a broadening competitive frontier. Meanwhile, DeepSeek V3.2, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super, and Kimi K2 prove that frontier-class reasoning is increasingly accessible at commodity price points, and Meta's Llama 4 Scout pushes open-weight context to an unprecedented 10M tokens.

Strategic Takeaway (2026)

"Which LLM to use?" is now a real architectural decision with no single correct answer. Match the model to the workload: peak intelligence and reasoning → Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.4; coding and long-horizon agents → Claude Opus 4.6; tool-heavy real-time agents → Grok 4.20; massive context or open-weight deployment → Llama 4 Scout (10M tokens) or NVIDIA Nemotron; cost-sensitive or self-hosted → DeepSeek V3.2, Qwen3.5 397B, or Kimi K2. Success depends on pairing these capabilities — spanning context (128K–10M tokens), pricing ($0.28/M to $25/M output), and task fit — to your specific workload rather than defaulting to a single vendor.

Looking ahead, the defining trends are accelerating: composite reasoning benchmarks (not single-metric scores) are becoming the standard for model evaluation; open-weight models now rival closed flagships across most non-frontier tasks; and the emergence of strong Chinese contenders (MiMo-V2-Pro, GLM-5, MiniMax-M2.7, Qwen3.5) signals that the frontier is genuinely global. The combination of sub-dollar-per-million-token cost (DeepSeek, NVIDIA Nemotron), 10M-token context (Llama 4 Scout), and 1M-token commercial flagships (Gemini 3.1, GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6) makes advanced LLM capability accessible for more applications and organizations than at any prior point.